Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Kansas

Poky Feeders, Inc.

Scott City, KS · ~96 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Poky Feeders, Inc. runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Poky Feeders, Inc.: 7.9 TCR = 175% of Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Poky Feeders, Inc. safety composite

Poky Feeders, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2024

Poky Feeders, Inc. injury rate improved

Poky Feeders, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.0 from 8.9 in 2017 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 19.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.9 · 2018=19.6 · 2019=6.3 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=8.0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Scott City, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.9 · 175% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #37/50
  • PHOTO NA Timmerman, Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NA Timmerman, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Poky Feeders, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Poky Feeders, Inc. averages 7.9 TCR (175% of the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Poky Feeders, Inc. TCR series: 2017=8.9 · 2018=19.6 · 2019=6.3 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=8 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=5 · BLS 4.5

Where Poky Feeders, Inc. falls in its industry

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except s establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 50 Beef cattle feedlots (except s employers in Kansas.

Poky Feeders, Inc. (96 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Poky Feeders, Inc.
Poky Feeders, Inc. (96 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Poky Feeders, Inc. has more employees than the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 7 0 0
2023 3.6 2.1 5 0 0
2022 8.0 4.3 11 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 5 0 0
2019 6.3 6.3 8 0 0
2018 19.6 11.1 23 0 0
2017 8.9 8.9 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · KS · Scott City

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 11 employers in Scott City, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NA Timmerman, Inc 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knight Feedlot Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reeve Cattle Company 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boise Valley Feeders, LLC 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE TATRO Plumbing Co. Inc. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch and Co Door Division 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Flesh Company 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6585 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott County Hospital 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wheatland Electric Cooperative, Inc. 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Lane Nursing Home 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairleigh Feed Yard 81 FTE
NAT-TCR Lynchburg Care Center LLC 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Honeyville Metal, LLC 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Concrete - Georgia 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1382 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Family Care Network, PLLC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Choice Roofing Middle Tennessee LLC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integrated Power Services Litchfield Service Center 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tevis Energy, Inc. (Westminster) 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.