Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Kansas

Fairleigh Feed Yard

Scott City, KS · ~81 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairleigh Feed Yard runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Fairleigh Feed Yard: 5.2 TCR = 116% of Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairleigh Feed Yard safety composite

Fairleigh Feed Yard scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Fairleigh Feed Yard injury rate improved

Fairleigh Feed Yard's TCR fell 4.6 from 6.4 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=16.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Scott City, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.2 · 116% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #19/50
  • PHOTO Circle Three Feed Ya…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Circle Three Feed Yard, Ltd (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Fairleigh Feed Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairleigh Feed Yard averages 5.2 TCR (116% of the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairleigh Feed Yard TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=16.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Fairleigh Feed Yard falls in its industry

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except s establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 50 Beef cattle feedlots (except s employers in Kansas.

Fairleigh Feed Yard (81 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairleigh Feed Yard
Fairleigh Feed Yard (81 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Fairleigh Feed Yard has more employees than the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2023 4.6 2.8 5 0 0
2022 4.7 1.9 5 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.6 4.6 4 0 0
2019 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2017 16.2 11.2 13 0 0
2016 6.4 5.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · KS · Scott City

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 11 employers in Scott City, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Circle Three Feed Yard, Ltd 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuma Feedlot 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Friona Cattle Feeders North #1 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FORT KEARNY CONSOLIDATED 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FreeState Electric coop 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tippins 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE WC Maize 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arconic Aerospace Center 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott County Hospital 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wheatland Electric Cooperative, Inc. 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Lane Nursing Home 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR POKY FEEDERS, INC. 96 FTE
NAT-TCR B & B Distributors, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Association for Vision Rehabilitation and Employment - Binghamton 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Centurion Eagle Auto Transport PR 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trimfoot Company, LLC. 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brown County Human Services 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freehold Cartage Inc., Solid Waste 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Meadows 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc.- Poland 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.