Semiconductor devices manufacturing · Minnesota

Polar Semiconductor, LLC

Bloomington, MN · ~552 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Polar Semiconductor, LLC runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Semiconductor devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Polar Semiconductor, LLC: 2.1 TCR = 62% of Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Polar Semiconductor, LLC safety composite

Polar Semiconductor, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Polar Semiconductor, LLC injury rate improved

Polar Semiconductor, LLC's TCR fell 2.9 from 4.6 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · Bloomington, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO ALT
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~552 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ALT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Polar Semiconductor, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Polar Semiconductor, LLC averages 2.1 TCR (62% of the Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Polar Semiconductor, LLC TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=1 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Polar Semiconductor, LLC falls in its industry

437 Semiconductor devices manufact establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Semiconductor devices manufact employers in Minnesota.

Polar Semiconductor, LLC (552 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Polar Semiconductor, LLC
Polar Semiconductor, LLC (552 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Polar Semiconductor, LLC has more employees than the Semiconductor devices manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.4 7 2 0
2023 0.9 0.7 5 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 4 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 5 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 6 1 0
2019 3.2 1.9 15 0 0
2018 1.0 0.7 10 1 0
2017 4.2 2.7 24 4 0
2016 4.6 2.7 24 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · MN · Bloomington

437 Semiconductor devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 306 employers in Bloomington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ALT 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coherent - AMD (Starkville) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR II-VI OptoElectronic Devices, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SunPower Corporation - SPCA East Katella Anaheim 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ziegler BLoomington 552 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3061_5905 552 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regina Hospital (United Hastings Regina) 553 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hennepin County District Court 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0081 BLOOMINGTON 8170 BLDG 2,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP - 8170 2,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington/Normandale 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donaldson Company Inc. 1,390 FTE
NAT-TCR STR0328 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Lumber 462 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Glue Dots International 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR J&L Manufacturing 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lgb Long Beach Airport 552 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alatrade Foods Inc - Phenix City 552 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black Canyon 552 FTE
NAT-SIZE McEntire Produce inc 552 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.