Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials · Pennsylvania

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton

Hazle Township, PA · ~52 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials workplace, earning a grade F.

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton: 7.3 TCR = 221% of Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton safety composite

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2020

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton injury rate improved

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton's TCR fell 4.8 from 9.3 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=11.8 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 324122 · Hazle Township, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 221% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO IKO Hillsboro
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IKO Hillsboro (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton averages 7.3 TCR (221% of the Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=11.8 · 2019=3 · 2020=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton falls in its industry

148 Roofing coatings made from pur establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Roofing coatings made from pur employers in Pennsylvania.

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton (52 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton
Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton (52 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Polyglass USA, Inc. - Hazleton has fewer employees than the Roofing coatings made from purchased asp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2018 11.8 6.8 7 0 0
2017 7.8 6.5 6 0 0
2016 9.3 7.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

324122 · PA · Hazle Township

148 Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 36 employers in Hazle Township, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IKO Hillsboro 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Karnak Corporation 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlanta Roofing Plant 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bitec Inc 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maitri Genetics 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insa Shamokin Dam 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ethos Fairless Hills 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hazleton Distribution Center 972 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hershey Co Hazleton 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9720 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hershey - Hazleton Plant 533 FTE
NAT-TCR Bedrock Concrete LLC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Polymers & Chemicals, Inc 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Denton Distribution Center 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TrueNorth Steel-Billings 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Volvo Cars of Austin 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE SunnyBrook of Fairfield 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rifenburg Construction, Inc.-North Carloina 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCS II, AJV DC Regional Grounds 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.