Solid waste combustors or incinerators, nonhazardous · Minnesota

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management

Alexandria, MN · ~55 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management runs at 710% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Solid waste combustors or incinerators, nonhazardous workplace, earning a grade F.

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management: 18.5 TCR = 710% of Solid waste combustors or incinerators, nonhazardous BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management safety composite

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management: 12.1 → 13.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 30.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2024

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management's TCR rose 1.2 from 12.1 in 2017 to 13.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 30.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562213 · Alexandria, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.5 · 710% of ind

  • DART 11.6 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Therm Tec, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Therm Tec, Inc. (5.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management averages 18.5 TCR (710% of the Solid waste combustors or incinerators, nonhazardous BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management TCR series: 2017=12.1 · 2018=19 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=23.5 · 2022=30.5 · 2023=24.4 · 2024=13.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management falls in its industry

74 Solid waste combustors or inci establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Solid waste combustors or inci employers in Minnesota.

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management (55 employees, TCR 18.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management
Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management (55 employees, TCR 18.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Pope Douglas Solid Waste Management has more employees than the Solid waste combustors or incinerators, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.3 11.6 7 1 0
2023 24.4 19.1 12 2 0
2022 30.5 14.4 11 6 0
2021 23.5 19.9 12 1 0
2020 12.1 12.1 6 0 0
2019 12.7 10.6 5 1 0
2018 19.0 14.8 7 2 0
2017 12.1 12.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562213 · MN · Alexandria

74 Solid waste combustors or incinerators, nonhazardous employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Alexandria, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Therm Tec, Inc. 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilmarth Gen Plant-KR 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Incinerator 26.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commerce Refuse-to-Energy Facility 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Langhorst Pork, Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gemko of Forest Lake dba WDI Company 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE FCO Echo 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melrose, MN (Arvig) 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas County Hospital DBA Alomere Health 923 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas Machine Inc. 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Extrusion Company 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Technical and Community College 385 FTE
NAT-TCR Town of Essex 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Clark Industries, Inc 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DC35 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mike McCall Landscape, Inc. 18.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 468 Borg Warner - Bellwood 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 204 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE 03 Brewer 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Office 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.