623311 Continuing Care Retirement Communities · Pennsylvania

Poplar Run

Myerstown, PA · ~126 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Poplar Run runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 623311 Continuing Care Retirement Communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Poplar Run: 10.5 TCR = 277% of 623311 Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Poplar Run safety composite

Poplar Run scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Poplar Run injury rate improved

Poplar Run's TCR fell 2.0 from 3.6 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 21.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=6.6 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=21.3 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=18.1 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Myerstown, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 277% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #180/257
  • PHOTO American House - Par…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 78 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American House - Park Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Poplar Run in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Poplar Run averages 10.5 TCR (277% of the 623311 Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Poplar Run TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=6.6 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=21.3 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=18.1 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Poplar Run falls in its industry

4,127 623311 Continuing Care Retirem establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #180 safest of 257 623311 Continuing Care Retirem employers in Pennsylvania.

Poplar Run (126 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Poplar Run
Poplar Run (126 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Poplar Run has more employees than the 623311 Continuing Care Retirement Commun median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2023 13.6 3.4 4 0 0
2022 18.1 4.5 8 0 0
2021 6.8 1.0 7 0 0
2020 21.3 13.4 13 14 0
2019 13.3 4.4 18 0 0
2018 9.7 3.7 13 0 0
2017 6.6 5.1 9 0 0
2016 3.6 2.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Myerstown

4,127 623311 Continuing Care Retirement Communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 32 employers in Myerstown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American House - Park Place 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Foothills Retirement Community 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Bossier City 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Thousand Oaks 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Modern Mushroom Farms, Inc. 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Reading 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forcine Concrete & Construction Co. Inc. 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE BQ Philadelphia 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Myerstown, PA 659 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayer Myerstown 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dutch-Way Farm Market Myerstown 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dutch Valley Food Distributors 215 FTE
NAT-TCR Rotational Molding of Utah 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Complete Care Summit Ridge 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DAX3 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Akins Fresh Market-Quincy 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Emerson Professional Tools MFG LLC 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arctic Sheet Metal, Inc. - Portland, OR 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Stratford 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Ribbon Linen Supply, Inc. 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.