Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) · Florida

Port of Miami Crane Management INC

Miami, FL · ~55 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Port of Miami Crane Management INC runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) workplace, earning a grade D.

Port of Miami Crane Management INC: 5.8 TCR = 129% of Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Port of Miami Crane Management INC safety composite

Port of Miami Crane Management INC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2021→2023

Port of Miami Crane Management INC injury rate improved

Port of Miami Crane Management INC's TCR fell 6.5 from 10.8 in 2021 to 4.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.8 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488310 · Miami, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 129% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO C-Port Marine Services
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C-Port Marine Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Port of Miami Crane Management INC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Port of Miami Crane Management INC averages 5.8 TCR (129% of the Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Port of Miami Crane Management INC TCR series: 2021=10.8 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=4.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Port of Miami Crane Management INC falls in its industry

81 Maintenance services, waterfro establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Maintenance services, waterfro employers in Florida.

Port of Miami Crane Management INC (55 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Port of Miami Crane Management INC
Port of Miami Crane Management INC (55 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Port of Miami Crane Management INC has fewer employees than the Maintenance services, waterfront termina median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2021 10.8 10.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488310 · FL · Miami

81 Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C-Port Marine Services 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Negociado Maritimo - Muelles ABC y D 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterfront Department 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Negociado Maritimo 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE BBTS 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jay Plant 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anclote Fossil Plant 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longwood Operations Complex 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR Lck Ltl 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakwood Heights of Presbyterian SeniorCare 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Everett Steel 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Eau Claire 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westonka ISD #277-Grandview 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Worth Company 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nam Dae Mun Farmers Market Lilburn 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.