General Warehousing and Storage · New Jersey

Port Reading PRD

Port Reading, NJ · ~129 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Port Reading PRD runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Port Reading PRD: 0.3 TCR = 6% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Port Reading PRD safety composite

Port Reading PRD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Port Reading PRD: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 0.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.97× in 2022

Port Reading PRD's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Port Reading, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #5/333
  • PHOTO Estee Lauder - Ruland
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Estee Lauder - Ruland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Port Reading PRD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Port Reading PRD averages 0.3 TCR (6% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Port Reading PRD TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=0.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Port Reading PRD falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 333 General Warehousing and Storag employers in New Jersey.

Port Reading PRD (129 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Port Reading PRD
Port Reading PRD (129 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Port Reading PRD has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Port Reading

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 13 employers in Port Reading, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Estee Lauder - Ruland 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olive Branch - MS2 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN - Multi-Client 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warehouse : ROMEOVILLE RMV 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 201-NJ-New Jersey Central 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Automated Logic Controls (New York-New Jersey) 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Associated Fire Protection, Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newark Container 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bed Bath and Beyond Port Reading 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Reading PR3 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Panalpina NYLogistics 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Island Transportation Corp - Port Reading NJ 104 FTE
NAT-TCR Shared Service Center SSC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun City 34050 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dabomatic Corporation 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland Office Area 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5108 Wheaton Unique 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Phoenix 39150 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at U of Conn Health Center 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Uah - University Center 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.