Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Wisconsin

Port Washington Generating Station

Port Washington, WI · ~40 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Port Washington Generating Station runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Port Washington Generating Station: 1.1 TCR = 93% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Port Washington Generating Station safety composite

Port Washington Generating Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Port Washington Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Port Washington Generating Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Port Washington, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Zimmer Power Station
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Zimmer Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Port Washington Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Port Washington Generating Station averages 1.1 TCR (93% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Port Washington Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Port Washington Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Electric power generation, fos employers in Wisconsin.

Port Washington Generating Station (40 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Port Washington Generating Station
Port Washington Generating Station (40 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Port Washington Generating Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 5.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · WI · Port Washington

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 33 employers in Port Washington, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Zimmer Power Station 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Martin 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMR Plant Martin 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. Sam Rayburn Plant 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE W. & E. Radtke, Inc. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS Global-Waunakee 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE AZCO WPL Wood County Solar 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hoeft Builders, Inc. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin Energy 884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kleen Test Products - SSR 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kleen Test Products - Moore Road 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kickhaefer Manufacturing Co - Park Street 178 FTE
NAT-TCR Trans-Tech Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Bethlehem Gardner Facility 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Furst-McNess Company (Rockford) 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Il - Utas 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hoover Treated Wood Products - Bakersfield 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koch Metal 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE SFO 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Scandia 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.