Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire · Oregon

Portland Branch

Portland, OR · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portland Branch runs at 243% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade F.

Portland Branch: 8.0 TCR = 243% of Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portland Branch safety composite

Portland Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.7

2016→2024

Portland Branch injury rate improved

Portland Branch's TCR fell 15.7 from 18.6 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=14.9 · 2019=14.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 243% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Salem
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Portland Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portland Branch averages 8.0 TCR (243% of the Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portland Branch TCR series: 2016=18.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=14.9 · 2019=14.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Portland Branch falls in its industry

270 Chain link fencing and fence g establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Chain link fencing and fence g employers in Oregon.

Portland Branch (52 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Portland Branch
Portland Branch (52 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Portland Branch has fewer employees than the Chain link fencing and fence gates made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2021 12.2 9.7 5 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 14.9 6.0 10 0 0
2018 14.9 6.0 10 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 18.6 12.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · OR · Portland

270 Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salem 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridon American Corporation 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gerard Daniel Worldwide 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cascade Coil Drapery Inc. 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE R.D. Offutt Co. NW 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia River Log Scaling Bureau 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00419 KLAMATH FALLS OPNS 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR C076 Elyria 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dudley Laundry Company dba Appeara 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maine Course Hospitality Group - Waterville Hampton Inn 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Crew One Productions - Rothbury 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE HTL Knoxville 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 231 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taper 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Plainfield 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.