Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing · Oregon

Portland Purina Feed Mill

Portland, OR · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portland Purina Feed Mill runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Portland Purina Feed Mill: 2.4 TCR = 62% of Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portland Purina Feed Mill safety composite

Portland Purina Feed Mill scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Portland Purina Feed Mill: 2.7 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.48× in 2024

Portland Purina Feed Mill's TCR rose 3.3 from 2.7 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 62% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Pilgrim's Douglas Fe…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pilgrim's Douglas Feed Mill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Portland Purina Feed Mill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portland Purina Feed Mill averages 2.4 TCR (62% of the Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portland Purina Feed Mill TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.9

Where Portland Purina Feed Mill falls in its industry

756 Livestock feeds, supplements, establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Livestock feeds, supplements, employers in Oregon.

Portland Purina Feed Mill (35 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Portland Purina Feed Mill
Portland Purina Feed Mill (35 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Portland Purina Feed Mill has fewer employees than the Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · OR · Portland

756 Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pilgrim's Douglas Feed Mill 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition - LeCompte 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peco Farms Lake Feed Mill 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Massillon Purina Feed Mill 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schanno-McClaskey Orchards, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ekstrom Nursery Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Rio Farms 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redmond Maint HQ 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Wildfire Defense Systems, Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 01049-01-01-Walla Walla 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Femia IRA 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Westmoreland ICF 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stockmeister Enterprises, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oaks at Beaufort 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lattice Materials 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoover,AL 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.