Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Oaks at Beaufort

Beaufort, SC · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oaks at Beaufort runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Oaks at Beaufort: 7.1 TCR = 188% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oaks at Beaufort safety composite

Oaks at Beaufort scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.5

2021→2024

Oaks at Beaufort injury rate improved

Oaks at Beaufort's TCR fell 17.5 from 17.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=17.5 · 2022=3.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Beaufort, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 188% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #48/107
  • PHOTO The Pearl at Jamestown
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Pearl at Jamestown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Oaks at Beaufort in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oaks at Beaufort averages 7.1 TCR (188% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oaks at Beaufort TCR series: 2021=17.5 · 2022=3.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Oaks at Beaufort falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Oaks at Beaufort (35 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oaks at Beaufort
Oaks at Beaufort (35 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oaks at Beaufort has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 17.5 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Beaufort

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 56 employers in Beaufort, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Pearl at Jamestown 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthology of Blue Ash 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Country Meadows Associates / George M Leader Family Corporation / Leader Holdings 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conway Service Center and Warehouse 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLORENCE DISTRICT OFFICE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Delivery Operations (Charleston) 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaufort Memorial Hospital 1,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1383 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1383 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7181 276 FTE
NAT-TCR Craig Mechanical, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Pneumatic Tube 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Rehabilitation Institute of St Louis 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southfield 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stockmeister Enterprises, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland Purina Feed Mill 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenbriar Ag Management Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lattice Materials 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.