Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Minnesota

Power Plant

Hibbing, MN · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Power Plant runs at 497% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Power Plant: 6.0 TCR = 497% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Power Plant safety composite

Power Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Power Plant: 3.2 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2019

Power Plant's TCR rose 5.5 from 3.2 in 2018 to 8.7 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Hibbing, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 497% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/24
  • PHOTO Northeastern 1 and 2
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northeastern 1 and 2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Power Plant averages 6.0 TCR (497% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Power Plant TCR series: 2018=3.2 · 2019=8.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 24 Electric power generation, fos employers in Minnesota.

Power Plant (31 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Power Plant
Power Plant (31 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Power Plant has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MN · Hibbing

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 53 employers in Hibbing, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northeastern 1 and 2 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Falls Utilities 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Corp Whse - Ventura 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR High Bridge Combined Cycle-SK 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE High Island Dairy 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Protein Sources, LLP 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Gen Plant-UC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 58 Lake Superior Place 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV - Range Medical Center 811 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2937 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR L&M Radiator 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2937 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Ohio Gratings, Inc. Texas 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Pellet Mill 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Steinberg Mfg. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fas Rdu 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Faf Den 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogall Painting, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faf Sea 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skills of Central Pa Inc Chestnut Ave 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.