Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · Colorado

Power Product Services, Inc.

Aurora, CO · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Power Product Services, Inc. runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Power Product Services, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 21% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Power Product Services, Inc. safety composite

Power Product Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2019

Power Product Services, Inc. injury rate improved

Power Product Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Aurora, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/135
  • PHOTO Scott Electric Company
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scott Electric Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Power Product Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Power Product Services, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (21% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Power Product Services, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Power Product Services, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 135 Telecommunications equipment a employers in Colorado.

Power Product Services, Inc. (61 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Power Product Services, Inc.
Power Product Services, Inc. (61 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Power Product Services, Inc. has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CO · Aurora

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 497 employers in Aurora, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scott Electric Company 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rabalais Constructors, LLC. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICS integrated Communication Systems 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LKC-Farmingdale 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yuma Feedlot 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Earth Enterprises Inc dba Waste-Not Recycling - Earth Enterprises Inc dba Waste-Not Recycling 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3020229 - Great Hall Completion 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jordy Construction 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Colorado 6,663 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Aurora_CO 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primoris Renewable Energy 1,695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN5 1,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Krueger International Corporate Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Faf Gcy 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR H.B. Frazer Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Deer Park Headquarters 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE indiCo, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Co 12 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE AP Services 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE JET Printing 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.