Generators and sets, electric (except internal combustion engine, welding, turbine generator sets), manufacturing · North Carolina

PowerFab

Randleman, NC · ~77 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PowerFab runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Generators and sets, electric (except internal combustion engine, welding, turbine generator sets), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

PowerFab: 4.4 TCR = 133% of Generators and sets, electric (except internal combustion engine, welding, turbine generator sets), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PowerFab safety composite

PowerFab scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2016→2024

PowerFab injury rate improved

PowerFab's TCR fell 7.2 from 9.1 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.1 · 2017=11.0 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Randleman, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO Inmotion
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inmotion (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

PowerFab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PowerFab averages 4.4 TCR (133% of the Generators and sets, electric (except internal combustion engine, welding, turbine generator sets), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PowerFab TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2017=11 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=3 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where PowerFab falls in its industry

222 Generators and sets, electric establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Generators and sets, electric employers in North Carolina.

PowerFab (77 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate PowerFab
PowerFab (77 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

PowerFab has fewer employees than the Generators and sets, electric (except in median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2023 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2020 4.3 1.4 3 0 0
2019 3.7 1.2 3 0 0
2018 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2017 11.0 2.8 8 0 0
2016 9.1 4.5 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · NC · Randleman

222 Generators and sets, electric (except internal combustion engine, welding, turbine generator sets), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Randleman, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inmotion 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Everson Tesla Inc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4039-03301000-00W007 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nidec Motor Corporation -Princeton 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rutherford-Polk 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triangle Warehouse 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Resources 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh Asphalt Operations 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dart Container Randleman 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2704 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2704 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asheboro Bearing Plant 203 FTE
NAT-TCR David M. Maines Associates, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EnerSys Romeoville 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nikkel & Associates, Inc dba NAI Electrical Contractors 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR D. B. Cheerleaders, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Olympic Forest Products 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Hampton Nursing & Rehabliation Center 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ft Myers Branch 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE White River Materials, Inc. 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.