Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network · North Carolina

Invictus Logistics

Durham, NC · ~77 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Invictus Logistics runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network workplace, earning a grade F.

Invictus Logistics: 16.2 TCR = 249% of Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Invictus Logistics safety composite

Invictus Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 8.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Invictus Logistics: 0.0 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 28.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2024

Invictus Logistics's TCR rose 11.3 from 0.0 in 2020 to 11.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 28.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Durham, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.2 · 249% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #193/214
  • PHOTO OPELOUSAS (LAOPE)
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OPELOUSAS (LAOPE) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Invictus Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Invictus Logistics averages 16.2 TCR (249% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Invictus Logistics TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=19.1 · 2022=28.3 · 2023=22.5 · 2024=11.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Invictus Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #193 safest of 214 Local letter and parcel delive employers in North Carolina.

Invictus Logistics (77 employees, TCR 16.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Invictus Logistics
Invictus Logistics (77 employees, TCR 16.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Invictus Logistics has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.3 8.0 7 0 0
2023 22.5 14.6 17 0 0
2022 28.3 21.2 16 0 0
2021 19.1 19.1 10 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NC · Durham

6,679 Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OPELOUSAS (LAOPE) 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WAELM - ELMA CENTER 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duke Logistics 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 666090000 16.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rutherford-Polk 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triangle Warehouse 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Resources 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh Asphalt Operations 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Talamore St. Cloud 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD072 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CAS015 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington Electric Coop, Inc. - Garage 16.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Traton LLC 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casella Waste Systems - Salem 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arc Broward- BARC 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Embassy Suites by Hilton Seattle-Tacoma International Airport 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.