Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Michigan

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc.

Livonia, MI · ~145 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. safety composite

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. injury rate improved

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 4.6 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Livonia, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #30/60
  • PHOTO PLYMOUTH, MI
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PLYMOUTH, MI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. falls in its industry

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugate establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 60 Shipping containers, corrugate employers in Michigan.

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. (145 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt (Classic Container), Inc.
Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. (145 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. has more employees than the Shipping containers, corrugated, made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 1.6 5 1 0
2019 4.3 4.3 7 0 0
2018 3.2 2.5 4 1 0
2017 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2016 4.6 2.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MI · Livonia

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 282 employers in Livonia, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PLYMOUTH, MI 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CRK, LLC dba/Innovative Packaging Solutions 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Packaging Solutions, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Packaging - Brooklyn Park, MN 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dutchman Tree Farms LLC 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Northeast 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grunwell-Cashero Co 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Electrical Contractors Inc. 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR System Office - Livonia 6,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission Plant 3,122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission 2,968 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acro Service 2,701 FTE
NAT-TCR Strategic Electric Group, LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Audubon 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rocky Mount 07 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodland Heights Medical Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Target Container) Inc. 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Rockwall Corrugating) LLC 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Warehousing Inc. 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.