Commercial building construction · California

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc

Riverside, CA · ~145 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc: 0.3 TCR = 11% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc safety composite

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2017→2024

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc injury rate improved

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Riverside, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/486
  • PHOTO Lemartec Corp.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lemartec Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc averages 0.3 TCR (11% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 486 Commercial building constructi employers in California.

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc (145 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc
Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc (145 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Riverside

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 536 employers in Riverside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lemartec Corp. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Finish, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sussex Development Corporation 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis Office 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CADY - 02 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE R&T Farm Management, Inc. 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Mist Farms - Castroville 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE SANTA ROSA OFFICES 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Riverside 8,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-21 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Community Hospital 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681351 RIVERSIDE MED CENTER 2,349 FTE
NAT-TCR CK Newberry Highway and Heavy Construction LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Plant Services, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Anderson Automotive Group, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Flournoy Construction Group 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Rockwall Corrugating) LLC 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Classic Container), Inc. 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Warehousing Inc. 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Target Container) Inc. 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.