General freight trucking, local · Georgia

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate

Conyers, GA · ~51 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate: 0.2 TCR = 4% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate safety composite

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate held a steady TCR band

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Conyers, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/122
  • PHOTO Laudick Trucking, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Laudick Trucking, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate averages 0.2 TCR (4% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 122 General freight trucking, loca employers in Georgia.

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate (51 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate
Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate (51 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Corporate has more employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · GA · Conyers

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 137 employers in Conyers, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Laudick Trucking, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlotte 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEXT Trucking Inc 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Williams Produce, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE THREE NOTCH ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPARATION 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Peachtree Service Center 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands - Conyers Corporate 1,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Rockdale Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands Lighting Conyers Complex 980 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCDLGATL 627 FTE
NAT-TCR Startek - Hamilton, OH 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Albemarle 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Silgan Containers Allentown 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sappi NA - South Portland 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benjamin Steel Co-Mansfield 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE purcell construction inc. Virginia 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Minden, Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cargill Poultry 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.