General freight trucking, local · Ohio

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg

Lewisburg, OH · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg: 1.4 TCR = 31% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg safety composite

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg: 0.0 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 4.43× in 2023

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg's TCR rose 6.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 4.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Lewisburg, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 31% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #27/186
  • PHOTO JFW Corp.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JFW Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg averages 1.4 TCR (31% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 186 General freight trucking, loca employers in Ohio.

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg (31 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg
Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg (31 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Lewisburg has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · OH · Lewisburg

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 11 employers in Lewisburg, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JFW Corp. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1246 -LH - Live Oak, FL 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norfolk 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCC : 3550-00 Thomas and Betts/Byhalia, MS 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Valley Ranch 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 5 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 3 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lewisburg Container LLC 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt (Lewisburg Container) LLC 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt (Lewisburg Corrugating), LLC 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fluid Connectors : Lewisburg TFD W 115 FTE
NAT-TCR Anning-Johnson Company Virginia 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR purcell construction inc. Virginia 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Wire and Cable Corp 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KC - Kipling & Coal Mine 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE On Call Services and Rentals, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Fire Alarm 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pickett Equipment 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moor+South PIER Management Company 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.