Preparing goods for transportation (i.e., crating, packing) · Ohio

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC

Cincinnati, OH · ~107 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Preparing goods for transportation (i.e., crating, packing) workplace, earning a grade B.

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC: 2.3 TCR = 51% of Preparing goods for transportation (i.e., crating, packing) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC safety composite

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2017

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC injury rate improved

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488991 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Foreign Trade Export…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Foreign Trade Export Packing Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC averages 2.3 TCR (51% of the Preparing goods for transportation (i.e., crating, packing) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=0.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC falls in its industry

91 Preparing goods for transporta establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Preparing goods for transporta employers in Ohio.

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC (107 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC
Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC (107 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Pratt (Midwest Displays), LLC has more employees than the Preparing goods for transportation (i.e. median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2016 3.8 1.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488991 · OH · Cincinnati

91 Preparing goods for transportation (i.e., crating, packing) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Foreign Trade Export Packing Company 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5G Acquisitions, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JR PRODUCE SUPPLY, INC. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DISTRIBUTION CENTER 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 292-NiSource-Columbus OH-East Op Ctr 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEILERCO 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Aluminum Corporation 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reliable Contractors Inc 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Grid Solutions : AIS - USC - Charleroi, PA, USA 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4627 Colorado Spring 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy Inpatient Meical Associates (MIMA) 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom-Crete, Austin 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Lebanon South LLC 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago Distribution Center 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Times Supermarket - Kaneohe 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avante at Waynesboro 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.