Acoustical system engineering design services · North Carolina

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc.

Huntersville, NC · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Acoustical system engineering design services workplace, earning a grade F.

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 238% of Acoustical system engineering design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. safety composite

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Huntersville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.2 · 238% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO Somerset, PA (PA0447)
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Somerset, PA (PA0447) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (238% of the Acoustical system engineering design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=2.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. falls in its industry

690 Acoustical system engineering establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Acoustical system engineering employers in North Carolina.

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. (75 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc.
Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. (75 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Pratt & Miller Engineering & Fabrication, Inc. has fewer employees than the Acoustical system engineering design ser median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · NC · Huntersville

690 Acoustical system engineering design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 117 employers in Huntersville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Somerset, PA (PA0447) 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roccor, LLC Longmont 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Bath Campus (1198) 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR B88 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARM 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGRICULTURAL-FARMING 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Systems 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Raleigh South 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGuire Nuclear 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Huntersville Medical Center 1,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntersville Field Support Center 929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metrolina Greenhouses - Huntersville NC 725 FTE
NAT-TCR Terso Solutions 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Evonik Birmingham Laboratories 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1915-2000X 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Associated Underwater Services Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE BPGraphics, Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISP - Ground Ops 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE JAX - Ground Ops 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centennial Healthcare Center 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.