Paper, scrap, merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF

Conyers, GA · ~83 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Paper, scrap, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF: 1.8 TCR = 82% of Paper, scrap, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF safety composite

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2020

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Conyers, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.8 · 82% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #19/49
  • PHOTO TMR Okeechobee
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TMR Okeechobee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF averages 1.8 TCR (82% of the Paper, scrap, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=3.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF falls in its industry

1,126 Paper, scrap, merchant wholesa establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 49 Paper, scrap, merchant wholesa employers in Georgia.

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF (83 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF
Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF (83 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Pratt Recycling Conyers MRF has more employees than the Paper, scrap, merchant wholesalers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · GA · Conyers

1,126 Paper, scrap, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 137 employers in Conyers, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TMR Okeechobee 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMM Group Millington 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alter Metal Recycling - Davenport Operation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMM Group NEMT 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Transmission Support, P&C Field Services, Maintenance/Reliability - 160 Lake Mirror Road Forest Park 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC NW Metro Regional Bussiness Center 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Georgia Concrete, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coreslab Structures (Atlanta), Inc. 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands - Conyers Corporate 1,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Rockdale Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands Lighting Conyers Complex 980 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCDLGATL 627 FTE
NAT-TCR HOLLAND St Martin 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard by Marriott Downtown Akron 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer #268 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Triumph Accessory Services 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hanover Foods, Ridgely MD 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alamo Structural Steel-Waco Plant 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenbriar Treatment Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Android Industries- Greenville 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.