Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · North Carolina

Pratt & Whitney Asheville

Asheville, NC · ~562 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt & Whitney Asheville runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt & Whitney Asheville: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt & Whitney Asheville safety composite

Pratt & Whitney Asheville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pratt & Whitney Asheville: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2024

Pratt & Whitney Asheville's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 1.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Asheville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #2/15
  • PHOTO P&W Elmendorf AFB F1…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~562 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: P&W Elmendorf AFB F119 Engine Operation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pratt & Whitney Asheville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt & Whitney Asheville averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt & Whitney Asheville TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt & Whitney Asheville falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 15 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in North Carolina.

Pratt & Whitney Asheville (562 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt & Whitney Asheville
Pratt & Whitney Asheville (562 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Pratt & Whitney Asheville has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.1 8 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · NC · Asheville

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR P&W Elmendorf AFB F119 Engine Operation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belac 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enjet Aero - AMG 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Praxair GE Technologies 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Novozymes Franklinton 563 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America : Charlotte 563 FTE
STATE-SIZE East 563 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Roberts Company, Inc 560 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Gulf Island - Fabrication Yard 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Engel Holdings Inc. dba Safway Atlantic - Union City 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gimpel Valve Manufacturing 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TK Elevator Indianapolis 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ontario HUB 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE 434-DC434 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boehringer Ingelheim Athens Georgia 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC 562 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.