Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard · Michigan

Pratt(classic Container),inc

Livonia, MI · ~129 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt(classic Container),inc runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Pratt(classic Container),inc: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt(classic Container),inc safety composite

Pratt(classic Container),inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2020→2023

Pratt(classic Container),inc injury rate improved

Pratt(classic Container),inc's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.8 in 2020 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.8 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Livonia, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #14/60
  • PHOTO SupplyOne Chesapeake
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SupplyOne Chesapeake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Pratt(classic Container),inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt(classic Container),inc averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt(classic Container),inc TCR series: 2020=2.8 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt(classic Container),inc falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, shipping, laminated pap establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 60 Boxes, shipping, laminated pap employers in Michigan.

Pratt(classic Container),inc (129 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt(classic Container),inc
Pratt(classic Container),inc (129 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pratt(classic Container),inc has more employees than the Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and pap median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2021 3.0 2.2 4 0 0
2020 2.8 0.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MI · Livonia

1,338 Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 282 employers in Livonia, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SupplyOne Chesapeake 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR IP Hazleton PA NAC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR IP - Carson 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CorrChoice - Cincinnati (Greif) 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Huron County Road Commission 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Traverse Container 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aludyne West Michigan LLC - Stevensville 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elm Plating Company 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR System Office - Livonia 6,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission Plant 3,122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission 2,968 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acro Service 2,701 FTE
NAT-TCR Industrial Chemicals Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida Agripower Associates, LLC. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rohrer Corporation - Addison Facility 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sebastopol Processing 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Town of Thomaston 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&C Clean Team Enterprises, LLC DBA Widmer's 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acument 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE INX International Ink Co. (5800) 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.