Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Pennsylvania

IP Hazleton PA NAC

Hazleton, PA · ~122 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

IP Hazleton PA NAC runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

IP Hazleton PA NAC: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

IP Hazleton PA NAC safety composite

IP Hazleton PA NAC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

IP Hazleton PA NAC: 2.5 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

IP Hazleton PA NAC's TCR rose 0.8 from 2.5 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Hazleton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #23/81
  • PHOTO SupplyOne Chesapeake
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SupplyOne Chesapeake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

IP Hazleton PA NAC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows IP Hazleton PA NAC averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

IP Hazleton PA NAC TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where IP Hazleton PA NAC falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 81 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Pennsylvania.

IP Hazleton PA NAC (122 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate IP Hazleton PA NAC
IP Hazleton PA NAC (122 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

IP Hazleton PA NAC has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 0.8 2 2 0
2023 1.6 0.0 0 2 0
2022 2.4 0.8 2 1 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 3 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2017 3.2 2.4 3 1 0
2016 2.5 1.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · PA · Hazleton

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 79 employers in Hazleton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SupplyOne Chesapeake 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR IP - Carson 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CorrChoice - Cincinnati (Greif) 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Christian Street Service Building 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE LANSC Lancaster Service Center 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valiant Energy Service, LLC. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND DESIGN 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - AVP1 2,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Case Ready Hazleton PA 872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lehigh Valley Hospital - Hazleton 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR LVH-Hazleton 722 FTE
NAT-TCR Molded Fiber Glass Research 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Frontier Bridge 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR KTH Parts Industries 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Beecroft Construction 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piqua Manor 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Baths Manufacturing, LTD. - Chrisman Facility 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gonzales Winery 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.