Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · New York

Precious Plate, Inc.

Niagara Falls, NY · ~149 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precious Plate, Inc. runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Precious Plate, Inc.: 7.7 TCR = 234% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precious Plate, Inc. safety composite

Precious Plate, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.0

2016→2024

Precious Plate, Inc. injury rate improved

Precious Plate, Inc.'s TCR fell 14.0 from 19.7 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 19.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.7 · 2017=9.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Niagara Falls, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 234% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO Pioneer Metal Finish…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~149 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Precious Plate, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precious Plate, Inc. averages 7.7 TCR (234% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precious Plate, Inc. TCR series: 2016=19.7 · 2017=9.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Precious Plate, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Electroplating metals and form employers in New York.

Precious Plate, Inc. (149 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Precious Plate, Inc.
Precious Plate, Inc. (149 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Precious Plate, Inc. has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 4.5 7 2 0
2023 7.6 7.0 12 0 0
2022 4.5 2.5 6 1 0
2021 6.3 4.5 7 0 0
2020 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2019 5.7 2.1 6 2 0
2017 9.2 5.4 13 4 0
2016 19.7 13.3 21 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · NY · Niagara Falls

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 107 employers in Niagara Falls, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TSA Processing 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elite Metal Finishing 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2016log300a 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE GLENS FALLS CUSTOMER SERV CTR-NY07 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Island Pump & Tank Corp. 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE EMCOR Services - Betlem 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2636-NEW YORK.OFFSITE 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR Venture Forthe 1,711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sevenson overall injury report 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Company 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1909 421 FTE
NAT-TCR First Food Co 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Parks Mt Union 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Town Centre 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Airtec Corporation 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nosco-Gurnee North 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Maid Products 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coperion Ktron (CKSA) - Salina 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount Pleasant Waterworks Main 149 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.