Plating metals and metal products for the trade · Michigan

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe

Monroe, MI · ~133 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe: 7.7 TCR = 234% of Plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe safety composite

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−31.4

2016→2021

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe injury rate improved

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe's TCR fell 31.4 from 33.9 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 33.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=33.9 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Monroe, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 234% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/48
  • PHOTO Precious Plate, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precious Plate, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe averages 7.7 TCR (234% of the Plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe TCR series: 2016=33.9 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe falls in its industry

585 Plating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 48 Plating metals and metal produ employers in Michigan.

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe (133 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe
Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe (133 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Pioneer Metal Finishing Monroe has more employees than the Plating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.4 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.6 2.9 5 0 0
2018 3.2 2.5 5 0 0
2017 3.2 3.2 5 0 0
2016 33.9 20.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MI · Monroe

585 Plating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 96 employers in Monroe, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precious Plate, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TSA Processing 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elite Metal Finishing 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2016log300a 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Power Line Supply - ALL 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davenport Masonry, Inc 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA MI Farmington Hills 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iceberg Enterprises 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Regional Hospital 1,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frenchtown 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerdau - Monroe Mill 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Power Plant 495 FTE
NAT-TCR FOSSAC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Patterson Logistics Services 2 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jarvis Company, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Terry Marxen Chevrolet Cadillac 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohio Metals 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philadelphia Historic District 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westward Look A Wyndham Grand Resort 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Technical Ceramics Jacksonville 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.