Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing · California

Precision Coil Spring

El Monte, CA · ~88 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Coil Spring runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Precision Coil Spring: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Coil Spring safety composite

Precision Coil Spring scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2017→2022

Precision Coil Spring injury rate improved

Precision Coil Spring's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · El Monte, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO WOLVERINE COIL SPRIN…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WOLVERINE COIL SPRING CO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Precision Coil Spring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Coil Spring averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Coil Spring TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Coil Spring falls in its industry

189 Coiled springs (except clock, establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Coiled springs (except clock, employers in California.

Precision Coil Spring (88 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Coil Spring
Precision Coil Spring (88 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Precision Coil Spring has more employees than the Coiled springs (except clock, watch), li median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.1 1.4 3 0 0
2019 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2017 5.2 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · CA · El Monte

189 Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 71 employers in El Monte, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WOLVERINE COIL SPRING CO 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fennell Spring Co, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leggett and Platt Automotive Carthage 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apex Spring & Stamping Corporation 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Neil Bassetti Farms, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Espinosa 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoei Foods USA, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Hill Ranches Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 231 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPS1 1,431 FTE
CITY-NEAR CMS Telstar 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR D Longo, LLC dba Longo Toyota 612 FTE
NAT-TCR Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4316 Sioux Falls SD Container 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4174 Fort Worth Sheet Feeder 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 3330 Chattanooga Mill 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kerry Vesper 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harborhill Place 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisville 38050 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flower City Printing 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.