Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass · Arkansas

Precision Glass Bending

Greenwood, AR · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Glass Bending runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade A.

Precision Glass Bending: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Glass Bending safety composite

Precision Glass Bending scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Precision Glass Bending held a steady TCR band

Precision Glass Bending's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Greenwood, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Cardinal IG -IG Tech…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cardinal IG -IG Tech Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Precision Glass Bending in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Glass Bending averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Glass Bending TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Glass Bending falls in its industry

441 Glass products (except packagi establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Glass products (except packagi employers in Arkansas.

Precision Glass Bending (24 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Glass Bending
Precision Glass Bending (24 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Precision Glass Bending has fewer employees than the Glass products (except packaging contain median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · AR · Greenwood

441 Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 9 employers in Greenwood, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cardinal IG -IG Tech Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal CT -Los Angeles CT 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adel CT 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oldcastle Building Envelope 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peco Foods Inc-Live Haul 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Gin Co 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE AECI - Dell Power Plant 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Producers Rice Mill, Inc. Stuttgart Construction 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3231 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3231 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alpha Packaging 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armedica by PHS 68 FTE
NAT-TCR Crumbl Enterprises LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MercyCare South 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Callahan, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stryker Medical - Vocera CA 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #365 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dfa Distributing South - Columbia Sc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #324 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Uc Health Broomfield Hosp Food 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.