Heat treating ovens, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Precision Thermal Processing

Clintonville, WI · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Thermal Processing runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heat treating ovens, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Precision Thermal Processing: 4.5 TCR = 136% of Heat treating ovens, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Thermal Processing safety composite

Precision Thermal Processing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Precision Thermal Processing injury rate improved

Precision Thermal Processing's TCR fell 2.4 from 7.8 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333994 · Clintonville, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 136% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO Perceptive Industrie…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perceptive Industries Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Precision Thermal Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Thermal Processing averages 4.5 TCR (136% of the Heat treating ovens, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Thermal Processing TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Thermal Processing falls in its industry

103 Heat treating ovens, industria establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Heat treating ovens, industria employers in Wisconsin.

Precision Thermal Processing (52 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Thermal Processing
Precision Thermal Processing (52 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Precision Thermal Processing has fewer employees than the Heat treating ovens, industrial process- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 1.3 2 2 0
2023 2.9 1.4 1 1 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 7.2 3.6 4 0 0
2020 3.7 1.8 1 1 0
2019 6.3 0.0 4 0 0
2018 3.3 0.0 1 1 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 7.8 5.2 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333994 · WI · Clintonville

103 Heat treating ovens, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 22 employers in Clintonville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Perceptive Industries Inc 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kanthal 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPI Corporation 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Thermal Systems 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABS Dekorra 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milk Source, LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfire Management Services, LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hoffman Planning, Design & Construction Inc 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creative Converting 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seagrave Fire Apparatus 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walker Forge, Inc. 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seagrave Fire Appartus 284 FTE
NAT-TCR Garner Production 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bodensteiner Implement Company Dyersville Location 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Benton Harbor Health Center 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland (BAMG) 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE ASK Chemicals LLC - Headquarters 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waxahachie Yard 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Dakota Water 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brown Vending Company Hattiesburg 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.