Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture · Wisconsin

Seagrave Fire Appartus

Clintonville, WI · ~284 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seagrave Fire Appartus runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade F.

Seagrave Fire Appartus: 7.6 TCR = 230% of Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seagrave Fire Appartus safety composite

Seagrave Fire Appartus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2016→2020

Seagrave Fire Appartus injury rate improved

Seagrave Fire Appartus's TCR fell 8.2 from 14.1 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.1 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336120 · Clintonville, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 230% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #28/29
  • PHOTO WPAX 0183 (ALLENTOWN…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 89 inj
  • SIZE ~284 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WPAX 0183 (ALLENTOWN PA - F) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Seagrave Fire Appartus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seagrave Fire Appartus averages 7.6 TCR (230% of the Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seagrave Fire Appartus TCR series: 2016=14.1 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Seagrave Fire Appartus falls in its industry

124 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 29 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, employers in Wisconsin.

Seagrave Fire Appartus (284 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Seagrave Fire Appartus
Seagrave Fire Appartus (284 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Seagrave Fire Appartus has more employees than the Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.9 4.6 19 0 0
2019 5.6 3.0 14 1 0
2018 5.5 4.2 12 1 0
2017 6.9 3.2 17 0 0
2016 14.1 6.2 27 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336120 · WI · Clintonville

124 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 22 employers in Clintonville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WPAX 0183 (ALLENTOWN PA - F) 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Volvo Trucks NA New River Valley Plant 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Flyer of America Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lehigh Valley Operations 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cargill Cocoa & Chocolate 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creation Technologies MIL 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ki Mobility - Headquarters (Stevens Point, WI) 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3499 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creative Converting 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seagrave Fire Apparatus 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walker Forge, Inc. 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alwin Manufacturing d.b.a Deluxe Plastics 157 FTE
NAT-TCR Morongo 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TECC Painting Company 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Industry 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chapel St 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kronospan LLC 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Friendship Manor 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reeves Young 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chesapeake Integrated Behavioral Health Department 284 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.