Brakes and clutches, electromagnetic, manufacturing · Michigan

Precision Torque Control, Inc

Midland, MI · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Torque Control, Inc runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Brakes and clutches, electromagnetic, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Precision Torque Control, Inc: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Brakes and clutches, electromagnetic, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Torque Control, Inc safety composite

Precision Torque Control, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2021→2024

Precision Torque Control, Inc injury rate improved

Precision Torque Control, Inc's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335314 · Midland, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/12
  • PHOTO SSI Technologies Pla…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SSI Technologies Plainfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Precision Torque Control, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Torque Control, Inc averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Brakes and clutches, electromagnetic, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Torque Control, Inc TCR series: 2021=4.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Torque Control, Inc falls in its industry

156 Brakes and clutches, electroma establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 12 Brakes and clutches, electroma employers in Michigan.

Precision Torque Control, Inc (26 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Torque Control, Inc
Precision Torque Control, Inc (26 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Precision Torque Control, Inc has fewer employees than the Brakes and clutches, electromagnetic, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335314 · MI · Midland

156 Brakes and clutches, electromagnetic, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 135 employers in Midland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SSI Technologies Plainfield 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORMEC Systems Corp 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SEL Charlotte NC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheboygan Falls 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms Cass City 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE United States Gypsum 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee Power Station 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bronson SC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Chemical - Great Lakes Bay Region Corporate Facilities 3,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR MyMichigan Medical Center Midland 2,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center - Midland 2,348 FTE
NAT-TCR American Engineering Testing 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shaw & Sons, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kold Draft International, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR JI&M Rockett 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Premium Food & Beverage - SC - SCPFB 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brady Construction of Ocala Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Fabrication, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marck Recycling & Waste of NE Arkansas LLC 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.