Countertops (i.e., kitchen, bathroom), wood or plastics laminated on wood, manufacturing · Indiana

Premier Concepts Plant 137

Warsaw, IN · ~65 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Premier Concepts Plant 137 runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Countertops (i.e., kitchen, bathroom), wood or plastics laminated on wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Premier Concepts Plant 137: 6.7 TCR = 203% of Countertops (i.e., kitchen, bathroom), wood or plastics laminated on wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Premier Concepts Plant 137 safety composite

Premier Concepts Plant 137 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Premier Concepts Plant 137: 3.3 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 14.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2022

Premier Concepts Plant 137's TCR rose 0.8 from 3.3 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 14.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337110 · Warsaw, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #33/38
  • PHOTO Custom Wood Products
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Custom Wood Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Premier Concepts Plant 137 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Premier Concepts Plant 137 averages 6.7 TCR (203% of the Countertops (i.e., kitchen, bathroom), wood or plastics laminated on wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Premier Concepts Plant 137 TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=14.3 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Premier Concepts Plant 137 falls in its industry

508 Countertops (i.e., kitchen, ba establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 38 Countertops (i.e., kitchen, ba employers in Indiana.

Premier Concepts Plant 137 (65 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Premier Concepts Plant 137
Premier Concepts Plant 137 (65 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Premier Concepts Plant 137 has fewer employees than the Countertops (i.e., kitchen, bathroom), w median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2021 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2020 14.3 8.2 7 0 0
2019 4.1 2.0 2 0 0
2018 9.7 4.9 6 0 0
2017 3.3 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337110 · IN · Warsaw

508 Countertops (i.e., kitchen, bathroom), wood or plastics laminated on wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 100 employers in Warsaw, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Custom Wood Products 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The L.E. Smith Company 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR O'Keefe Millwork 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR VT Industries of Georgia, a subsidiary of Holstein 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE FTWN NE Svc Ctr 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Runnebohm Construction Company Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELECOM PLACEMENT INC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE COMBDRIN-IndyEast 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zimmer Biomet West Campus 4,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zimmer Biomet 3,818 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zimmer Biomet North Campus 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR DePuy Synthes Warsaw 1,151 FTE
NAT-TCR 4598-Rtc Charlotte-International 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02418 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 547714-Sequim Po 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 033479-Gle-Arrowhead Sta 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE KLS Interface Union City 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blaise Alexander Subaru 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Massapequa 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piggly Wiggly #281 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.