Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · South Carolina

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina

Easley, SC · ~180 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina: 2.4 TCR = 62% of Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina safety composite

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2023→2024

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina injury rate improved

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina's TCR fell 1.7 from 3.2 in 2023 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.2 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621340 · Easley, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Loyola Ctr for Ortho…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Loyola Ctr for Ortho & Rehab at Oakbrook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina averages 2.4 TCR (62% of the Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina TCR series: 2023=3.2 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina falls in its industry

220 Physical therapy offices (e.g. establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Physical therapy offices (e.g. employers in South Carolina.

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina (180 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina (180 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina has more employees than the Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2023 3.2 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621340 · SC · Easley

220 Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 56 employers in Easley, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Loyola Ctr for Ortho & Rehab at Oakbrook 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patewood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Therapy Services 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Clinic 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE UFP NAC, LLC 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC Steel LLC 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filtration Group LLC 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2207 LOWE S OF N. AUGUSTA SC 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRISMA HEALTH BAPTIST EASLEY MEDICAL CAMPUS 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yokohama Industries Americas South Carolina, LLC 395 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAPTIST EASLEY MED CAMPUS 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 631 319 FTE
NAT-TCR Wichita Operations Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 269 Godfrey 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 09 Grand Island 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BluePoint Controls Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE AERCO International 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitcy - Traverse City Center 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ilmar - Marion 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wycap - Casper Center 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.