Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg

Hollidaysburg, PA · ~115 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg runs at 480% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg: 18.3 TCR = 480% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg safety composite

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 26.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg: 6.2 → 29.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 60.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg's TCR rose 23.4 from 6.2 in 2021 to 29.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 60.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Hollidaysburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 480% of ind

  • DART 26.8 DART
  • RANK #242/257
  • PHOTO PRAIRIE HOMESTEAD
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PRAIRIE HOMESTEAD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg averages 18.3 TCR (480% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg TCR series: 2021=6.2 · 2022=19.1 · 2023=60.1 · 2024=29.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #242 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg (115 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg
Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg (115 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Presbyterian Village at Hollidaysburg has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 29.5 26.8 9 23 0
2023 60.1 55.4 12 52 0
2022 19.1 16.2 6 14 0
2021 6.2 2.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Hollidaysburg

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 26 employers in Hollidaysburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PRAIRIE HOMESTEAD 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Billings 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gold City Personal Care Center 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Andrews Village 18.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade's Greenhouses, Inc. - Lititz 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE WNDOB Windsor Office Building 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penn Hills Service Center 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael F. Ronca & Sons, Inc. 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLanahan Corporation 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garvey Manor 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollidaysburg Plant 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Major Wire Texas 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR R. A. Wold & Sons Inc 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Avid Pallet Services HQ - Main 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Casbr - San Bruno 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benicia Plumbing, Inc 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Retirement Ranches, Inc. 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Airdc-B5510-Afh- Airtex Dc 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmington MD FXFE-WMD 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.