Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Illinois

Presence Resurrection Medical Center

Chicago, IL · ~1,660 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Presence Resurrection Medical Center runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Presence Resurrection Medical Center: 5.8 TCR = 77% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Presence Resurrection Medical Center safety composite

Presence Resurrection Medical Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Presence Resurrection Medical Center held a steady TCR band

Presence Resurrection Medical Center's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.5 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 5.8 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #160/300
  • PHOTO Deaconess Midtown
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 199 inj
  • SIZE ~1,660 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Deaconess Midtown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Presence Resurrection Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Presence Resurrection Medical Center averages 5.8 TCR (77% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Presence Resurrection Medical Center TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=5.9 · BLS 7.5

Where Presence Resurrection Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #160 safest of 300 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Illinois.

Presence Resurrection Medical Center (1,660 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Presence Resurrection Medical Center
Presence Resurrection Medical Center (1,660 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Presence Resurrection Medical Center has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.9 2.1 64 1 0
2017 5.8 2.4 69 0 0
2016 5.5 2.8 66 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · IL · Chicago

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Deaconess Midtown 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - JEANES CAMPUS 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cook Hospital & Care Center 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MountainView Hospital 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morton Parts Distribution Center 1,662 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Litho, Inc. 1,657 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smithfield Monmouth 1,656 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7930 SOUTH HOLLAND PCS 1,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Terex - Field Service 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Millwood Inc. - Vienna 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Point Lookout Resort and Conference Center 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmont Village Memphis 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Osceola Regional Medical Center 1,660 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2001 Rankin Road 1,660 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philadelphia 1,661 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harford Co Govt 1,661 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.