Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Texas

Terex - Field Service

San Antonio, TX · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Terex - Field Service runs at 274% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Terex - Field Service: 5.8 TCR = 274% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Terex - Field Service safety composite

Terex - Field Service scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2016→2018

Terex - Field Service injury rate improved

Terex - Field Service's TCR fell 7.4 from 10.7 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.7 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 274% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #261/292
  • PHOTO Billings Location
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Billings Location (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Terex - Field Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Terex - Field Service averages 5.8 TCR (274% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Terex - Field Service TCR series: 2016=10.7 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Terex - Field Service falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #261 safest of 292 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Texas.

Terex - Field Service (56 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Terex - Field Service
Terex - Field Service (56 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Terex - Field Service has more employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2016 10.7 10.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · San Antonio

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Billings Location 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electric Motor Supply 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technical Services International Tx 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dragon Rigs LTD, Odessa TX Facility 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Native Texas Nursery 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dalhart Cattle Feeders 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oasis Gin, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comyn GP Shelling Plant 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Presence Resurrection Medical Center 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Millwood Inc. - Vienna 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ORD 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Point Lookout Resort and Conference Center 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harrisburg Shop 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Bay Pines 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Live Production Offices 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marion 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.