Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Primavera Ag Services

Reedley, CA · ~193 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Primavera Ag Services runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade D.

Primavera Ag Services: 7.8 TCR = 174% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Primavera Ag Services safety composite

Primavera Ag Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Primavera Ag Services: 7.9 → 11.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Primavera Ag Services's TCR rose 3.7 from 7.9 in 2017 to 11.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Reedley, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 174% of ind

  • DART 10.6 DART
  • RANK #492/620
  • PHOTO F. Aguilar FLC, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: F. Aguilar FLC, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Primavera Ag Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Primavera Ag Services averages 7.8 TCR (174% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Primavera Ag Services TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=9.9 · 2024=11.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Primavera Ag Services falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #492 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Primavera Ag Services (193 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Primavera Ag Services
Primavera Ag Services (193 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Primavera Ag Services has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.6 10.6 12 0 0
2023 9.9 7.4 12 0 0
2022 12.6 9.2 14 1 0
2021 5.9 5.0 7 0 0
2020 3.8 3.8 5 0 0
2019 6.9 2.8 10 0 0
2018 4.3 3.2 4 0 0
2017 7.9 7.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Reedley

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 60 employers in Reedley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR F. Aguilar FLC, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tonascia Farms, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Valley Associates, LLC 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DANMAR Inc. 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE George Chiala Farms - Hollister 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Covina S/C 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Maintenance 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc. 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Medical Center-Reedley 961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Valley Packing 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moonlight Packing Company LLC Field 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAR BENNETT LLC 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Contractors Steel Supply Inc 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Duke Farms Foundation 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR G.A. Productions, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Okvin - Vinita 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaCygne Energy Center 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Tallahassee 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russell Marine LLC 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Bonney Lake 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.