Continuing Care Retirement Communities · Indiana

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson

Anderson, IN · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing Care Retirement Communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson: 9.5 TCR = 251% of Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson safety composite

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−25.1

2021→2024

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson injury rate improved

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson's TCR fell 25.1 from 28.1 in 2021 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 28.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=28.1 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Anderson, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 251% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #105/136
  • PHOTO Cedarhurst Living, L…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Naperville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson averages 9.5 TCR (251% of the Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson TCR series: 2021=28.1 · 2022=7 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Com establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 136 Continuing Care Retirement Com employers in Indiana.

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson (47 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson
Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson (47 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Primrose Retirement Community of Anderson has fewer employees than the Continuing Care Retirement Communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2021 28.1 12.5 7 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Anderson

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 103 employers in Anderson, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Naperville 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oklahoma Methodist Manor 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casa de las Campanas 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Crest, Inc. 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE AquaBounty Farms Indiana LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Remington Plant 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Francesville 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boone REMC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter Express Inc 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital Anderson 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARRAH'S HOOSIER PARK RACING & CASINO 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle USA 798 FTE
NAT-TCR Gilroy 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Remington at Valley Ranch 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Westin New York at Times Square 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR New Hampshire Food Bank 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Primrose Retirement Community of Council Bluffs 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Wayne 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Bath 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of San Antonio 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.