Continuing Care Retirement Communities · Wyoming

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper

Casper, WY · ~35 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper runs at 454% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing Care Retirement Communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper: 17.3 TCR = 454% of Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper safety composite

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.2

2021→2024

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper injury rate improved

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper's TCR fell 18.2 from 25.4 in 2021 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 25.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=25.4 · 2022=20.3 · 2023=16.0 · 2024=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Casper, WY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 454% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO INN at Amethyst
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: INN at Amethyst (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wyoming employers → · Look up another →

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Primrose Retirement Community of Casper averages 17.3 TCR (454% of the Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper TCR series: 2021=25.4 · 2022=20.3 · 2023=16 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Primrose Retirement Community of Casper falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Com establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wyoming alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Continuing Care Retirement Com employers in Wyoming.

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper (35 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Primrose Retirement Community of Casper
Primrose Retirement Community of Casper (35 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Primrose Retirement Community of Casper has fewer employees than the Continuing Care Retirement Communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 3.6 2 0 0
2023 16.0 12.0 4 0 0
2022 20.3 12.2 5 0 0
2021 25.4 17.0 2 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WY · Casper

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 783 rated employers in Wyoming with headcount on file · 115 employers in Casper, WY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR INN at Amethyst 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elegance at Dublin 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthem Littleton Managment, LLC 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azura Memory Care of Kenosha 17.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE AZCO INC. - Holly Frontier 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vaughn's Plumbing & Heating Co. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terry R. Pitt Construction 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crafco, Inc-Cheyenne 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Campus 1,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Casper 679 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1617 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3778 359 FTE
NAT-TCR 2924 Dwt42 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sin Lee Food 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR United Counseling Service of Bennington County 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Inc Village of Freeport 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Primrose Retirement Community of Kansas City 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose Retirement Community of Shawnee 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leach Fleet 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE APS Foundation 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.