Continuing Care Retirement Communities · Wyoming

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette

Gillette, WY · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette runs at 354% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing Care Retirement Communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette: 13.5 TCR = 354% of Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette safety composite

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−36.4

2021→2024

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette injury rate improved

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette's TCR fell 36.4 from 51.2 in 2021 to 14.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 51.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=51.2 · 2022=13.1 · 2023=12.5 · 2024=14.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Gillette, WY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.5 · 354% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #5/11
  • PHOTO The Lutheran Church …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Lutheran Church Home of Buffalo, Inc. DBA GreenField Terrace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wyoming employers → · Look up another →

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette averages 13.5 TCR (354% of the Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette TCR series: 2021=51.2 · 2022=13.1 · 2023=12.5 · 2024=14.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Com establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wyoming alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 11 Continuing Care Retirement Com employers in Wyoming.

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette (43 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette
Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette (43 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette has fewer employees than the Continuing Care Retirement Communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.8 8.9 5 0 0
2023 12.5 3.1 4 0 0
2022 13.1 13.1 4 0 0
2021 51.2 29.3 2 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WY · Gillette

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 783 rated employers in Wyoming with headcount on file · 64 employers in Gillette, WY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Lutheran Church Home of Buffalo, Inc. DBA GreenField Terrace 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency on Whidby 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Des Moines 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACIFICA TUCSON LLC 13.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wyoming 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kemmerer #1163 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unit # 0120 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1205 Cheyenne 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell County Health 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell County Government 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1485 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cyclone Drilling Inc. 386 FTE
NAT-TCR Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Avamere at Newberg 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR JB Radiator Specialties, Inc. 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Protection 13.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morris Masonry Restoration LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earle M. Jorgensen 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Anderson 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grass Valley 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.