Construction management, commercial and institutional building · California

Principal Builders, Inc.

San Francisco, CA · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Principal Builders, Inc. runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Principal Builders, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 69% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Principal Builders, Inc. safety composite

Principal Builders, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Principal Builders, Inc.: 2.6 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.68× in 2024

Principal Builders, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 2.6 in 2022 to 3.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 69% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #207/486
  • PHOTO Foti Contracting LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Foti Contracting LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Principal Builders, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Principal Builders, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (69% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Principal Builders, Inc. TCR series: 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Principal Builders, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #207 safest of 486 Construction management, comme employers in California.

Principal Builders, Inc. (66 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Principal Builders, Inc.
Principal Builders, Inc. (66 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Principal Builders, Inc. has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · San Francisco

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Foti Contracting LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Runnebohm Construction Company Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lusardi Construction 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR One Source Building Services, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Clovernook Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Farmington ISD #192-High School/District Office 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sturdy Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith-Blair by Xylem 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Petro RI - Warwick 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Griffith WAVA - Cheverly 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minkoff Company, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE McGrath 1620, Inc (DBA: McGrath Acura of Libertyville) 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.