Printing, lithographic (except books, grey goods) · Ohio

Printing Service Company

Miamisburg, OH · ~51 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Printing Service Company runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Printing, lithographic (except books, grey goods) workplace, earning a grade B.

Printing Service Company: 2.1 TCR = 64% of Printing, lithographic (except books, grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Printing Service Company safety composite

Printing Service Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Printing Service Company held a steady TCR band

Printing Service Company's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.1 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Miamisburg, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 64% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #75/138
  • PHOTO RES Main
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RES Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Printing Service Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Printing Service Company averages 2.1 TCR (64% of the Printing, lithographic (except books, grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Printing Service Company TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=2 · 2018=4 · 2019=0 · 2020=2 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Printing Service Company falls in its industry

2,001 Printing, lithographic (except establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 138 Printing, lithographic (except employers in Ohio.

Printing Service Company (51 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Printing Service Company
Printing Service Company (51 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Printing Service Company has fewer employees than the Printing, lithographic (except books, gr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2016 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · OH · Miamisburg

2,001 Printing, lithographic (except books, grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 93 employers in Miamisburg, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RES Main 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hudson printing 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RIVERSIDE CA - JURUPA 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JR Cole Industries, Inc. - Label Division 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Portsmouth Service Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Gas & Oil 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 922-NiSource-Zanesville OH-Muskingum Op Ctr 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sycamore Medical Center 915 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3638-Y 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avery Dennison-Miamisburg 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR Danis Building Construction Company 490 FTE
NAT-TCR Stafford Manufacturing Corp. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Albany Regional 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kombi Ltd. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Covenant Home of Chicago 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE SitelogIQ-Healthcare 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland OR DI 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakes Distribution Center 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penn Life Sciences LLC 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.