Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Virginia

Priority Collision Center

Chesapeake, VA · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Priority Collision Center runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade B.

Priority Collision Center: 2.4 TCR = 70% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Priority Collision Center safety composite

Priority Collision Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Priority Collision Center held a steady TCR band

Priority Collision Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Chesapeake, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/73
  • PHOTO Ventura Toyota
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ventura Toyota (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Priority Collision Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Priority Collision Center averages 2.4 TCR (70% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Priority Collision Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Priority Collision Center falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 73 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Virginia.

Priority Collision Center (46 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Priority Collision Center
Priority Collision Center (46 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Priority Collision Center has fewer employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.3 0.0 4 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · VA · Chesapeake

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 434 employers in Chesapeake, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ventura Toyota 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR dunn chevrolet buick inc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Los Angeles-Century City 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR YORK IMPORTS INC. DBA LEHMAN VOLVO 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRUNSWICK COUNTY POWER STATION 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE 202-NiSource-Staunton VA 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs BIA-Dulles Rail-VA 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huang's Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF2 2,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesapeake Regional Medical Center 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR QVC Chesapeake, Inc. 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossways 931 FTE
NAT-TCR JM Manufacturing PBM 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Restec Contractors, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson - Atlanta GL 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TAC Air - OMA 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bergey's Truck Centers Trenton 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belvedere Commons 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAC Strap 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Manufacturing Company 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.