Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing · California

PRL Glass Systems, Inc.

Industry, CA · ~417 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PRL Glass Systems, Inc. runs at 408% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

PRL Glass Systems, Inc.: 13.5 TCR = 408% of Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PRL Glass Systems, Inc. safety composite

PRL Glass Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

PRL Glass Systems, Inc.: 12.8 → 13.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 16.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

PRL Glass Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 12.8 in 2019 to 13.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327211 · Industry, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.5 · 408% of ind

  • DART 11.9 DART
  • RANK #15/15
  • PHOTO GGI Glass Distributo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 364 inj
  • SIZE ~417 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GGI Glass Distributors Corp dba General Glass International (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

PRL Glass Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PRL Glass Systems, Inc. averages 13.5 TCR (408% of the Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PRL Glass Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2019=12.8 · 2020=14.5 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=16.1 · 2024=13.5 · BLS 3.3

Where PRL Glass Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

105 Flat glass (e.g., float, plate establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 15 Flat glass (e.g., float, plate employers in California.

PRL Glass Systems, Inc. (417 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 180 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate PRL Glass Systems, Inc.
PRL Glass Systems, Inc. (417 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 180 employees and a TCR of 3.3

PRL Glass Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.5 11.9 60 0 0
2023 16.1 11.4 71 1 0
2022 12.7 9.1 61 0 0
2021 11.3 8.0 48 0 0
2020 14.5 9.8 62 0 0
2019 12.8 9.1 62 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327211 · CA · Industry

105 Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 23 employers in Industry, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GGI Glass Distributors Corp dba General Glass International 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manko Window Systems 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TECHNI-GLASS INC 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BULLSEYE GLASS COMPANY 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE W.M. Lyles Co. 417 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Placing Northern California 417 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8800 NORCAL FRAMING 417 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1588 417 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morrow Meadows Corp. 2,022 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anning-Johnson Company Southern California 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freshpoint Southern California Inc 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smurfit Kappa Baldwin Park 178 FTE
NAT-TCR Casa de Ramana 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Serenity Hospice Care 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DEP014 - BNR-Wild-Sessions Wld Mgt Area 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Terrace Hermiston 13.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hornady MFG Co West Plant 417 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGMS-B382 417 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Transit East Metro Garage 417 FTE
NAT-SIZE 050 - Cascade 417 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.