Motorcycles and parts manufacturing · California

Pro Circuit - Wardlow

Corona, CA · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pro Circuit - Wardlow runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motorcycles and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Pro Circuit - Wardlow: 6.5 TCR = 196% of Motorcycles and parts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pro Circuit - Wardlow safety composite

Pro Circuit - Wardlow scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.5

2016→2024

Pro Circuit - Wardlow injury rate improved

Pro Circuit - Wardlow's TCR fell 17.5 from 17.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.5 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336991 · Corona, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 196% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Mahindra GenZe Fremont
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mahindra GenZe Fremont (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pro Circuit - Wardlow in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pro Circuit - Wardlow averages 6.5 TCR (196% of the Motorcycles and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pro Circuit - Wardlow TCR series: 2016=17.5 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pro Circuit - Wardlow falls in its industry

49 Motorcycles and parts manufact establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Motorcycles and parts manufact employers in California.

Pro Circuit - Wardlow (22 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Pro Circuit - Wardlow
Pro Circuit - Wardlow (22 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Pro Circuit - Wardlow has fewer employees than the Motorcycles and parts manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 11.8 11.8 2 0 0
2020 9.8 9.8 2 0 0
2019 9.3 9.3 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2016 17.5 11.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336991 · CA · Corona

49 Motorcycles and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mahindra GenZe Fremont 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arcimoto East 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Crosse Facility 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Cruz Bicycles 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Creative Surfaces Inc 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Essex Pavilion 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Five Star Concrete Contracting Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Poole Construction Services, LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orlando Utilities 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bolder Contractors, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Ruston 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.