Motor vehicle metal parts stamping · Michigan

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights

Sterling Heights, MI · ~86 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Motor vehicle metal parts stamping workplace, earning a grade C.

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights: 6.5 TCR = 120% of Motor vehicle metal parts stamping BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights safety composite

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.3

2016→2024

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights injury rate improved

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights's TCR fell 13.3 from 16.9 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.9 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Sterling Heights, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.5 · 120% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #112/165
  • PHOTO GNS Holland, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GNS Holland, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights averages 6.5 TCR (120% of the Motor vehicle metal parts stamping BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights TCR series: 2016=16.9 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 5.4

Where Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights falls in its industry

510 Motor vehicle metal parts stam establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 165 Motor vehicle metal parts stam employers in Michigan.

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights (86 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights
Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights (86 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Fisher Dynamics - Sterling Heights has fewer employees than the Motor vehicle metal parts stamping median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 1.2 1 2 0
2023 8.3 7.1 7 0 0
2022 8.2 5.8 7 0 0
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 0 1 0
2018 4.5 3.6 5 0 0
2017 7.8 4.3 8 1 0
2016 16.9 10.3 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Sterling Heights

510 Motor vehicle metal parts stamping employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 195 employers in Sterling Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GNS Holland, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LW Engineering Plant 1 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LW Engineering Plant 2 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northridge 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rite-Way Plumbing & Heating Inc 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Mechanical 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nationwide Construction Group 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wendricks Truss Inc 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 5,783 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERLING PLNT 2,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Stamping Plant 2,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conti, LLC 1,892 FTE
NAT-TCR Creative Surfaces Inc 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro Circuit - Wardlow 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Essex Pavilion 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Spectrum General Contractors, Inc. HQ 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Country Meadows of Forks 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone Memorials, Inc 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giroux Orchards, LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.