Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade · Ohio

PRO-TEC Coating Company

Leipsic, OH · ~378 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PRO-TEC Coating Company runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade A.

PRO-TEC Coating Company: 1.6 TCR = 50% of Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PRO-TEC Coating Company safety composite

PRO-TEC Coating Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

PRO-TEC Coating Company injury rate improved

PRO-TEC Coating Company's TCR fell 1.5 from 2.7 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Leipsic, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #14/52
  • PHOTO Oerlikon Balzers Coa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~378 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc Agawam (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

PRO-TEC Coating Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PRO-TEC Coating Company averages 1.6 TCR (50% of the Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PRO-TEC Coating Company TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=1 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where PRO-TEC Coating Company falls in its industry

646 Bonderizing metal and metal pr establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 52 Bonderizing metal and metal pr employers in Ohio.

PRO-TEC Coating Company (378 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate PRO-TEC Coating Company
PRO-TEC Coating Company (378 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

PRO-TEC Coating Company has more employees than the Bonderizing metal and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.2 5 0 0
2023 1.7 0.5 7 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 6 0 0
2021 1.5 1.3 6 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 5 0 0
2019 2.3 1.5 9 0 0
2018 1.7 1.4 6 0 0
2017 1.0 0.7 3 0 0
2016 2.7 0.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · OH · Leipsic

646 Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 12 employers in Leipsic, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc Agawam 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR vEC - St. Charles 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Praxair Surface Technologies Main Street 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plasma Processes 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tigerpoly Manufacturing 378 FTE
STATE-SIZE MED2 378 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woda Cooper Personnel 378 FTE
STATE-SIZE Children's Hospital Rehabilitation Center 378 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pretium Packaging - Leipsic 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHL 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Patrick Products, Inc. 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leipsic (State Route) 85 FTE
NAT-TCR Rentz Electric Co 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant McDonough 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boston Location 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SCRSC Scranton Service Center 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riddleberger Brothers, Inc. 378 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mosinee Mill 378 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evangeline Downs 378 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inland Hospital 378 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.