Off-road all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing · California

ProArmor Manufacturing

Corona, CA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ProArmor Manufacturing runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Off-road all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

ProArmor Manufacturing: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Off-road all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ProArmor Manufacturing safety composite

ProArmor Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2017→2024

ProArmor Manufacturing injury rate improved

ProArmor Manufacturing's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336999 · Corona, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO MFG-Augusta, GA-USA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MFG-Augusta, GA-USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

ProArmor Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ProArmor Manufacturing averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Off-road all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ProArmor Manufacturing TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where ProArmor Manufacturing falls in its industry

85 Off-road all-terrain vehicles establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Off-road all-terrain vehicles employers in California.

ProArmor Manufacturing (32 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 114 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ProArmor Manufacturing
ProArmor Manufacturing (32 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 114 employees and a TCR of 3.1

ProArmor Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Off-road all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wh median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.3 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336999 · CA · Corona

85 Off-road all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MFG-Augusta, GA-USA 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Specialized Vehicles - Augusta East 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Specialized Vehicles - Arctic Cat Sales Bucyrus 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Club Car : MFG-Augusta, GA-USA 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Von Braun Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hantover Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR JESCO, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MTN STN STU Storeroom 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE WMS Jacksonville 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boxout, LLC Jacksonville 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE RDF SW Missouri, LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE McPherson Industrial Corporation DBA Quality Chaser Company 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.